Budget 2000
Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations
Honourable Paul Ramsey, Minister
Reports
This electronic version is for informational purposes only.
The printed version remains the official version.
  Report D: TAX EXPENDITURES  

Introduction

A tax expenditure is defined as the reduction in tax revenues that results when government programs or benefits are delivered through the tax system rather than reported as budgetary expenditures. Tax expenditures are usually made by offering special tax rates, exemptions, or tax credits to program beneficiaries. Governments introduce tax expenditures primarily to achieve social policy objectives, such as transfers to lower income families or to promote economic development and job creation.

The major reason for reporting tax expenditures is to improve government accountability by providing a more complete picture of government spending. This report outlines major tax expenditures for the 1999/00 tax year. It does not include tax expenditures introduced or expanded in Budget 2000. These are described in Report C.

 
The Role of Tax Expenditure Programs

The main reason governments use the tax system to deliver programs is to reduce their own administration costs and to reduce compliance costs for recipients. In certain situations, the tax system allows intended beneficiaries to be readily identified from information that is already collected. In these cases, setting up a separate expenditure program would result in costly overlap and duplication of effort. An example is the provincial sales tax credit, which is delivered through the income tax system. If this were a direct provincial expenditure program, a provincial agency or office would have to be established to duplicate much of the work already done by the Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency. In addition, it would require individuals to undergo a separate, time-consuming application process in order to qualify for the benefit.

There are, however, several potential drawbacks to tax expenditure programs. First, their overall cost often receives less public scrutiny than is the case for spending programs because annual budget approvals are not typically required. Second, tax expenditure programs may confer the greatest benefits to those who pay the most taxes, which means that the major beneficiaries are often high-income earners. Sales tax exemptions, for example, often provide a greater absolute benefit to those with higher incomes because they have more to spend on consumer products. This can run counter to the objective of incorporating progressiveness into the tax system. Finally, costs are often more difficult to control under a tax expenditure program because the benefits tend to be more open ended and enforcement is often more difficult than for spending programs.

 
Tax Expenditure Reporting

Three criteria were used to choose those features of the tax system that should be reported as tax expenditures. First, the emphasis is on tax reductions, exemptions and refunds that are close equivalents to spending programs. Under this approach, the focus is on items that would not be out of place on a list of spending programs. By implication, the list does not include tax measures designed to meet broad tax policy objectives such as improving fairness in the tax system, or measures designed to simplify the administration of the tax. The list also does not include items that are generally excluded from a particular tax base. An example is the non-taxation of most services under provincial sales taxes, which are primarily designed to apply to purchases of goods. Finally, tax remission orders are not included, because they are not equivalent to an expenditure program, but are granted on a case-by-case basis.

Second, revenues raised under provincial government authority that are turned over to agencies outside of government are not reported as tax expenditures in this report. This includes, for example, horse racing tax revenues transferred to the Racing Commission, hotel room tax revenues transferred to Tourism BC, and fuel tax revenues transferred to the BC Transportation Financing Authority.

Third, smaller items of less than $2 million are not included. Where practical, smaller items have been presented together as an aggregate figure. For example, sales tax exemptions for farmers, fishers and aquaculturists are reported on a combined basis.

 
British Columbia Tax Expenditure Programs

The tables at the end of this report show 1999/00 tax expenditure estimates.

There were two additions to tax expenditures in Budget '99. A new incentive for research and development was announced with the details to be developed in consultation with industry. As a result, a new tax credit for Scientific Research and Experimental Development was introduced effective September 1, 1999. Also, the Corporation Capital Tax holiday was extended from two to four years for expenditures made after March 31, 1999.

For presentation purposes, British Columbia tax expenditures have been broken into three broad categories.

Each category has its own table of tax expenditure estimates. Within each table, the list of tax expenditures delivered through the income tax system has been separated into two sub-categories.

This means the province has no direct control over income tax preferences delivered through changes to the income tax base or in the calculation of basic federal tax. As a result, federal measures to provide tax relief for certain groups such as very low-income individuals and students will automatically reduce provincial income tax revenues.

Starting in 2001, British Columbia will move to a "tax on income" approach to calculating provincial income tax. This will provide the province with control over certain personal income tax credits. As a result, some of the federal tax credit measures shown in the following tables will be shown as provincial measures in future tax expenditure reports.

The personal income tax expenditures that have been included in the following tables cover a range of policy objectives, including support for charitable activities, health care and education. Meanwhile, most corporation income tax expenditures are intended to achieve economic development objectives.

The cost of individual tax expenditures cannot be added together to reach a total tax expenditure figure for two reasons. First, in some cases the programs interact with one another so that eliminating one program could increase or decrease the cost of another. Second, eliminating certain tax expenditure programs could change the choices taxpayers make, which in turn would affect the cost estimates.

Table
TABLE D1
SOCIAL AND INCOME TRANSFER PROGRAMS
Table
TABLE D2
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Table
TABLE D3
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAMS

 

PREVIOUS | CONTENTS | NEXT

HOME PAGES: Budget 2000
Legislative Assembly of British Columbia
Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations
Government of British Columbia
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS: Communications Branch (e-mail)

Copyright © 2000: Queen’s Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada